Speak Out: Will McDonnell's Tax Plan Help Virginia?
Governor's five-year, $3.1 billion transportation overhaul aims to fund major road and infrastructure needs. Tell us: Do you think the governor's plan is a sustainable option for road maintenance and new projects?
Virginia residents could see a higher sales tax — and the state could become the first in the country to shed its gas tax — if a transportation plan unveiled by Virginia Gov. Bob McDonnell passes the state's General Assembly during its 2013 session.
The five-year, $3.1 billion transportation overhaul is the governor's attempt to address some of the state's major road and infrastructure needs in coming years; $14 billion in projects are already underway across Virginia.
McDonnell said the 17.5 cent tax on gasoline — which accounts for more than 30 percent of Virginia's transportation revenues — was "dated," blaming inflation and better mileage on the dollar for making it a stagnant funding source.
Raising sales tax from 5 to 5.8 percent, the other cornerstone of the governor's proposal, would generate more than $600 million in additional funds, he said, a pool that will grow with the economy.
McDonnell's changes would ultimately give transportation a larger share of sales tax revenues.
Read more here about the proposal, which the General Assembly will begin to review Wednesday as it begins its 2013 session.
The plan was McDonnell's attempt to appease both Republicans, many of whom have spoken against any kind of tax hike, and Democrats, who have said they don't want to give more general fund money to transportation over education and other state priorities.
Americans for Tax Reform has issued a statement against the governor's plan, saying the proposal "as it stands now fails in its goal to prioritize transportation spending while avoiding tax increases."
Lt. Gov. Bill Bolling (R), who holds the tie-breaking vote in Virginia's split senate, backed the plan Tuesday.
Tell us: Do you think the governor's plan is a sustainable option for road maintenance and new projects? Which state priorities do you think deserve more or less funding?
Edward Janusz
9:34 am on Wednesday, January 9, 2013
I find it ironic that the two headlines in today's Wn Post are "McDonnell wants to end Va gas tax" and "Nation sets recors for heat last year". Science has long confirmed that global warming is cause by burning fossil fuels. Shouldn't we be discouraging the use of gasoline by raising the gas tax?
Dan
9:41 am on Wednesday, January 9, 2013
Yes.
Sandra
11:07 pm on Thursday, January 10, 2013
Shouldn't we be encouraging the use of alternative fuels and hybrids by taxing them less, rather than adding taxes onto those who own such vehicles???
Jackie
9:57 am on Wednesday, January 9, 2013
Yes, considering that the energy policy goal is more mileage to the gallon and the use of non-gas powered vehicles.
Gleb Taran
12:39 pm on Wednesday, January 9, 2013
Science has not confirmed that global warming is caused by burning fossil fuels. The world has been warming for 10,000 years since the last ice age. No new taxes - no new sales taxes - no new taxes period. The government tales in enough money to do everything that is required. It is a spending money problem, not a tax problem.
Carol Lewis
2:17 pm on Wednesday, January 9, 2013
I don't agree with you, Gleb. Even if science hasn't confirmed that global warming is caused by burning fossil fuels there is enough evidence that it contributes to it so we should be doing everything we can to limit the use of gas. As to your statement about no new taxes, the Gov is planning to cut the gas tax, not raise it.
Jim Daniels
12:58 pm on Wednesday, January 9, 2013
Really bad. First, given the overwhelming consensus on the reality of global climate change we should be discouraging more driving, not incentivizing it. Eliminating the gas tax will do just that. And couple that with the surcharge on alternative fuel vehicles you are in essence only charging those who have taken some responsibility for reducing their fossil fuel usage, a user fee, while letting HumVee drivers pay virtually nothing!. Second, one-third of the proposal relies on federal funding. I thought Governor 10th amendment was opposed to such things. It raids the general fund and diverts part of the revenue derived from sales taxes towards transportation (meaning roads), and away from education. Not to mention the sales tax is the single most regressive tax levied.This thing should die a very quick death!!!
Richard Williams
6:59 pm on Thursday, January 10, 2013
" given the overwhelming consensus on the reality of global climate change we should be discouraging more driving, not incentivizing it. Eliminating the gas tax will do just that. And couple that with the surcharge on alternative fuel vehicles you are in essence only charging those who have taken some responsibility for reducing their fossil fuel usage, a user fee, while letting HumVee drivers pay virtually nothing!. "
Could not agree more!!!! Well put!!
joe brewer
3:11 pm on Wednesday, January 9, 2013
Gas was 90 cents a gallon in 1986 and the gas tax is 17.5 cents. Take gas now at 4 times the 1986 level and our tax per gallon would equal 70 cents. Go ahead and raise the gas tax then tie it to inflation. Use the gas tax for roads and bridges not bike paths and sidewalks. Raise the sales tax 1/2 of 1% and get a handle on our infrastructure problems. Quit wasting money by giving it to the MWAA!
Richard Williams
7:19 pm on Wednesday, January 9, 2013
I agree with you 100% on the gas tax. But I disagree with the comment about bike paths and sidewalks. Those are essential for better quality of life (including the epidemic obesity rate).
Jeff P
4:36 pm on Wednesday, January 9, 2013
Totally agree with Joe Brewer
Navid Roshan
9:57 pm on Wednesday, January 9, 2013
You shouldnt. His statement is debase of reality. Sidewalks and paths constitute .03% of the VDOT budget. Not 3%, 0.03%
There is more spent on maintaining I-66 and I-495 annually than the total amount of money spent on Bike and pedestrian improvements in Virginia over the past decade.
But by all means, waste money by widening roads more and more... who am I... just a transportation engineer telling you that there is a finite limit to the benefit for road widening
Jonathan Erickson
7:38 pm on Wednesday, January 9, 2013
Using gas tax money for bike paths is pork in a bicycle form. Get the money for paths from the general fund, charge bicycle users for a liceinse, charge a odometer fee for cars but leave the gas tax for it's only intended purpose which is roads and bridges. Use part of the1/2% raise in sales tax for the paths but do both or you'll just be nibbling at the edges of a huge problem. This way you bite it in the ass, no pork. Same as the Sandy relief bill don't pass it until the pork is removed.
Carol Lewis
7:52 pm on Wednesday, January 9, 2013
Whoa! If you were the one in need of relief aid, like the victims of Sandy, I suspect you'd like the bill passed with pork if it meant you got help earlier. I don't mean that pork should be in there, but it's ridiculous to withhold help to people who need it.
Richard Williams
9:06 pm on Wednesday, January 9, 2013
I can admit when I make a mistake. Maybe I mis-read the earlier comment. I'm not aware of any proposal to use gas taxes for bike and foot paths. But I agree gas taxes should go to road maint. I was simply pointing out that bike and foot paths are something seriously missing in most communities. But that's usually handled at the local level. They are important though.
Jonathan Erickson
9:09 pm on Wednesday, January 9, 2013
Whats silly is that the politicans get away with adding pork because people have the attitude at any cost. Pure and simple bs. Passed 10 billion just the other day to help with claims now get the pork withdrawn
joe brewer
8:16 am on Thursday, January 10, 2013
A engineer that says we have reached our limit on road widening is a engineer whose projects were built should be named so i can avoid them.
Richard Williams
6:53 pm on Thursday, January 10, 2013
He didn't say we've reached our limit. He said " there is a finite limit to the benefit for road widening".
There are many examples in VA where this is already true, particularly up and down the I64 corridor from the west end of Richmond to Tidewater. Places where, yes, the road could be widened, but would not yield any significant benefit compared to the cost involved.
J. Griffin Crump
8:40 pm on Thursday, January 10, 2013
McDonnell's plan is a very good one. Since travel by car has become a virtual necessity for accessing work or just going grocery shopping, the burden of the gas tax falls most heavily on people of lowest income. Replacing it with the sales tax removes that burden and gives the consumer the choice of the commodity upon which to spend his/her money.
Sandra
11:12 pm on Thursday, January 10, 2013
That assumes that lower income people are currently buying things they don't need, and can cut back on "luxury goods" if the sales tax is raised. In these times, I think a lot of lower income people are already stretched to the limit, so raising the sales tax will hit them in the pocketbook no matter what.
Huey
2:23 am on Tuesday, January 15, 2013
You know what, McDonnell should go for the full 6% like Maryland has. It would only go up 5 cents per $5, meaning instead of a $5 Subway sandwich costing 5.25, it would cost $5.30. Not bad, considering that same sandwich costs $5.45 in Arlington and Alexandria. They should also raise taxes on cigarettes.
As far as the gas tax, if it's gone; it wouldn't make much of a difference. Take it away, but instead tax fuel guzzlers like Land Cruisers and Sequoias. We should never be taxed for fuel, but instead taxed for owning the cars that use up a lot of fuel. It makes more sense.
dawn auletta
1:02 pm on Friday, February 1, 2013
True statements here:
McDonnell’s plan would hit the poor, while letting the richest Virginian’s (not to mention any out of state drivers passing through) off largely scot-free
“Eliminating the gas tax paid by highway users and raising taxes on all other Virginians to pave our roads makes no sense”, said State Sen. Chap Petersen (D). “Indeed, eliminating our traditional road funding because cars are more efficient makes about as much sense as canceling your child’s college fund because tuition keeps rising”.
dawn auletta
1:02 pm on Friday, February 1, 2013
Gov. Bob McDonnell’s (R-VA) transportation bill passed the House of Delegates Finance Committee, moving past its first hurdle in the state’s 2013 General Assembly session. In a 14-8 vote along party lines, the committee passed McDonnell’s package, which calls for eliminating the state’s 17.5 cents per gallon gas tax and raising the state sales tax from 5% to 5.8%.