patching...
Welcome back, Patch Blogger!

Transportation and Transit Studies Under Way for Route 1 Corridor

Plans call for widening highway to six lanes

 

Editor's Note: This is the first of a three-part series examining transportation, development and business along the Route 1 corridor.

Part two focuses on upcoming mixed-use developments.

Part three focuses on the growing area hotel industry.

The Route 1 corridor in southeastern Fairfax County sees more than 60,000 vehicles per day—and it doesn't seem like any of those drivers are happy with the status quo on the 7.5-mile stretch of congested highway.

Neither are the cyclists who commute through or live near the corridor, nor pedestrians who patronize the highway’s incoherent patchwork of shops and restaurants set amid sprawling, unseemly parking lots. New apartments, stores and hotels planned for Route 1, as well as expansion at Fort Belvoir through the Base Realignment and Closure act, or BRAC, will add to the roadway's already-heavy usage.

Simply put—as many local residents are all too aware—there is too much traffic and not enough capacity.

Improvements Plans Abound

Plans have long been under way to add additional transit options along the corridor—including calls to extend Metro’s Yellow Line to at least Fort Belvoir—and to widen the highway, but those talks have, so far, resulted in little action on the ground.

Transportation needs along the highway are a top priority for local agencies and organizations, including the Washington-based Coalition for Smarter Growth.

“We think (the Route 1 corridor) can be a model for a walking, biking and more transit-accessible community,” said Stewart Schwartz, executive director of the coalition. “Route 1 should be a truly urban boulevard, one that ties together the whole corridor and is not simply a high-speed commuter route. It should be the Main Street for that part of Fairfax County.”

Last year, state Sen. Toddy Puller and Del. Scott Surovell, both Mount Vernon Democrats, succeeded in obtaining $3 million in state funds for a two-year transit study along Route 1 from Alexandria to Quantico. Solutions to the corridor’s transportation woes may include more buses or expansion of Metro’s Blue or Yellow lines, Puller said.

“Some people think the Blue Line would be cheaper, and some people really want the Yellow Line to go down Route 1,” she said. “But I don’t know if we have the density for Route 1. I don’t know if we’d have enough riders. That’s part of what has to be determined.”

Surovell said his annual constituent surveys show overwhelming support for extending Metro to Lorton. “Personally, I think extending the Metro underground would be the best thing we could do to support development on Route 1,” he said. “I think there’s a lot of work to be done in order to make that happen. There’s a lot of studies and community support needed.”

The study is being conducted by the Virginia Department of Rail and Public Transportation in conjunction with the county. In a November update, the state suggested improving traffic signals, establishing a dedicated transit lane and revamping transit shelters and pedestrian facilities.

Meanwhile, the county is currently in the process of obtaining $180 million in federal money to widen Route 1 to six lanes between Telegraph Road and Mount Vernon Highway, said Fairfax County Department of Transportation Director Tom Biesiadny. Biesiadny said an environmental study is now under way and said he could not estimate when construction could begin.

The road widening will leave space in the middle of the highway for future transit options such as express buses or rail.

Additional Studies In Progress

Two additional transit studies are planned for the corridor. The Countywide Transit Network Study, which could begin in early 2012, will cost approximately $2 million and will examine public transportation options throughout the county, including Route 1.

Second is an in-depth alternatives analysis for transit on Route 1 that would meet requirements to secure federal funding. That study will examine options for buses, light rail and Metro and is estimated to cost $3.5 million, Biesiadny said.

“It is our highest transit usage corridor in the county already, and obviously there have been redevelopment efforts underway in the corridor,” as well as BRAC, he said. “A number of additional jobs have been added at Fort Belvoir, and that has added to additional traffic that would benefit from transit and highway improvements.”

On the south end of the highway, Mulligan Road will be extended to Telegraph Road, said David Versel, executive director of the Southeast Fairfax Development Corp.

Cyclists Weigh In

Adam Froehlig, transportation liaison for the Huntington Community Association, likens cycling on Route 1 to “taking our lives in our own hands.”

“I would not cycle to Target,” Froehlig said. “I would be more apt to cycle to the Target at Potomac Yards, which is four miles away, than the one at Beacon Hill, which is one-and-a-half miles away, just because bicycle accommodation is better going throughout Alexandria.”

Froehlig’s transportation wish list includes bike lanes, turn lanes, speeds between 35 and 45 mph, timed signals, wide sidewalks and Metro.

Fairfax Advocates for Better Bicycling member Mark Murphy of Huntington said new developments have made Route 1 more accessible from Alexandria, but heading south on Route 1 past Huntington is difficult.
 
“The lights and the traffic are very unfriendly,” he said. “It can be dangerous to cross some of the intersections at Route 1 because drivers just aren’t looking for bikers.”

Cyclists are also interested in improved access from Route 1 to the Huntington Metro station. Murphy sees an opportunity to build better cycling amenities as Route 1 is redeveloped.

“It’s a now-or-never situation, I think, where they can keep cyclists and pedestrians in mind when they’re designing or redesigning Route 1,” he said. “They have a chance to make some improvements that would last a long time. It would be a lot harder to go in later and put something in after the fact.”

The county is currently formulating the Fairfax Countywide Bicycle Transportation Plan and has held multiple information sessions to gather input from cyclists. Bob Patten, a senior planner with Toole Design Group, the consultancy working with the county, said he hopes to have a draft plan ready to submit to the county’s Bicycle Advisory Committee in April.

Feedback from a Nov. 17 information session in Mount Vernon included comments that cycling the corridor is especially difficult during rush hours, that a lack of an alternative to Route 1 between Huntley Meadows Park and the neighborhoods south and west of Little Hunting Creek is a major barrier, that a trail along Cameron Run between Telegraph Road and Route 1 should be built, and that safety improvements are needed for cyclists coming and going from Wilson Bridge.

Public Transportation Initiative Going Slow

The county is currently making modest improvements along Route 1 through the Fairfax County Richmond Highway Public Transportation Initiative, which aims to improve transit services and pedestrian facilities between Huntington and Mount Vernon Memorial Highway. The initiative calls for upgrading bus stops, improving pedestrian facilities at 29 intersections and filling in 5.6 miles of missing sidewalks.

But since the initiative began in 2004, the county has added only three-fifths of one mile of sidewalks, improved pedestrian facilities at four intersections and competed seven REX bus stop improvements, said Michael Guarino, a Fairfax County transportation planner. Right-of-way issues, utility conflicts and the lack of space to add sidewalks that meet current design standards have caused delays, he said. There is no target completion date.

“We’re trying the best we can,” Guarino said. “We’re not going as fast as everybody would like, but we’re doing our best to get this on the ground.”

Froehlig, with the Huntington Community Association, is disappointed with the initiative’s pace to date.

“That has been very slow and almost nonexistent,” he said. “So we are basically, for lack of another term, stuck in a rut.”

Correction: Adam Froehlig's last name was initially spelled incorrectly. The error has been corrected.

Related Topics: Route 1, Scott Surovell, Toddy Puller, Traffic, and Transportation

Adam Froehlig

12:50 pm on Tuesday, December 20, 2011

In response to Sen. Puller's comment about the density and Metro: that same concern came up at Delegate Surovell's Town Hall this year. Bottom line is that if we build the Yellow Line extension, the density to support it will come. Look at Arlington's Orange Line corridor for an example.

Need to have the transportation infrastructure before you have the development.

Reply
Comment_arrow

Sally Spangler

11:30 pm on Wednesday, December 21, 2011

Thank you Sir, for coming to my rescue. The CSX tracks cross US 95 just where the "Y" lets US 1 traffic get onto US95 just before the bridge into Woodbridge. Then because of the left curve allowing trains onto the bridge into Prince William County there is a second crossing over Furnace Road. That road is a little more perilous because neither car can see the other without a honk to let the other side know they are coming through. I suspect the original name of the road was OX Road because oxen moving tobacco to the port of Colchester is just down over the hill from the railroad overpass. The house on the corner of Colchester and Furnace was originally an inn in colonial times. Oh yes, "Lorton" is a town name in England from which Mr. Plaskett left to come here. I still would like to find the furnace of Furnace Road. Got to be around here somewhere.

Sally Spangler

1:24 pm on Tuesday, December 20, 2011

Reiteration of a previous comment - 6 lanes of US1
What happens when the road gets to the CSX overpass? Anyone thinking of what is required at that junction? Presently it is barely 4 lanes and in poor condition. In winter ice forms on both the north and south lanes. By the by - Old Colchester road which connects with Furnace Road has a CSX overpass which is only ONE lane and in even worse condition. Morning and evening traffic right now can get rather "congested"? YOU Bet! To avoid US 1 many cars use Old Colchester. We may need a light at Gunston Road and Old Colchester to get people through that intersection in the future! Merry Driving All!

Reply
Comment_arrow

Will Radle

1:49 pm on Wednesday, December 21, 2011

In November Supervisor Hyland said daily congestion on Route 1 is worse than he had ever seen in his decades of living in and serving the region. We knew about BRAC changes 6 years ago in May 2005. Federal and state politicians did nothing to prepare.

Consistently rated among the worst traffic in the nation, we have the best arguments for significant federal investment. Sadly, in Congress we are represented by a man who could not persuade anyone to get out of a paper bag. We need change. The Washington Post has said Representative Moran is unfit for public office and House Democratic leaders including Nancy Pelosi have said he is an embarrassment. It's tough enough to persuade Speaker Boehner and Republican Leader Cantor; our district's lack of a respected representative hurts us.

Sally, when was the last time you or anyone has seen a CSX train over those tracks?

Merry Commuting to you, too!

A. Will Radle, Jr.
Creating a Culture of Listening
FairfaxAdvocates@gmail.com

Comment_arrow

Adam Froehlig

3:09 pm on Wednesday, December 21, 2011

Will: from her description, I believe she's referring to the CSX mainline bridge over Route 1 bridge down near the Occoquan. In other words, here:

http://maps.google.com/?ll=38.677821,-77.228748&spn=0.006458,0.010353&t=h&z=17&vpsrc=6

Comment_arrow

Will Radle

11:18 pm on Wednesday, December 21, 2011

Adam, thank you! Appreciate the link as well. As a candidate for public office, I accept responsibility for effective advocacy. This is not the first time our nation has developed around existing infrastructure. I would work with the community in identifying and executing best practices.

Sally, not a definitive answer on how we will proceed at that site; but, I hope you know the issue remains important and we will take responsible action. Thank you for remaining active in the process for our community.

T Brown

5:53 pm on Tuesday, December 20, 2011

Dedicated transit lanes for rapid bus transit or light rail would be very helpful, and on a more mundane level, bike racks at each of the connection points or bus shelters would extend the reach a mile or two, encouraging folks who live close enough to ride at least part way. I agree with Mr. Froehlig: whatever infrastructure is added will draw the density and development. Arlington is a great example.

Reply

LawMom

9:35 am on Wednesday, December 21, 2011

There is no question that the Route 1 corridor is not pediestrian friendly. I have seen pediestrian struck by cars. There is a huge need for more crosswalks, better lighting, instructional signage for both vehicles and pedestrians and police enforcement of driving and walking violators.

An extension of the yellow line down route 1 is really a no-brainer. This should have been in the works long ago. There is no question that the ridership will be ready by the time it's built.

Improvements in transit such as these will support residential and retail development along Route 1.

We need it now.

Reply
Comment_arrow

Sally Spangler

12:16 pm on Wednesday, December 21, 2011

Hopefully the people who come from places that the streets are only 6 to 8 feet wide and one way and the traffic is totally stopped because a stop light or some obstruction has brought the traffic to a halt so that pedestrians can cross the road anywhere will finally realize that they cannot do the same here. I see them calmly crossing the street, sometimes with small children in tow. - It gives me shivers every time I see it happen.
We need improvement in the types of retail development - but we need smarter users trying to cross the highway. Transit needs - yes, a tighter schedule of buses instead of maybe now, maybe later schedule we have now.

Comment_arrow

T Ailshire

3:55 pm on Friday, December 30, 2011

Despina, I'm not so sure we need more crosswalks - there are many areas where a crossing capability is needed, but there are no lights and a crosswalk would be ineffective. I think pedestrian overpasses are the ticket in those areas.

Those who want primacy for bikes on US1 are spitting in the wind. Bicyclists are supposed to follow the same rules as automobiles.

And to those who want increased density -- I moved to this area because it is NOT Arlington or Crystal City.

I continue to maintain that effective enforcement of traffic laws on US1 would solve a majority of our issues. That is something we CAN do while legislators "study".

T Brown

8:44 am on Saturday, December 31, 2011

Increased density is coming, whether residents like it or not. Route 1 would be a useful place along which to place it, so upgrading the infrastructure to handle the increase in population and the various burdens this places on a region is prudent.

I don't see any comments or article content that suggest "primacy" for bikes, either. Simply a place at the transportation table. Bicycles are an efficient, healthy way to get around. Why shouldn't we accommodate them, especially for relatively short trips of 1-3 miles? Rt 1 creates a traffic wall that makes traveling by bicycle extremely difficult. Shifting some of the footprint to allow for bikes would allow more people who might bicycle to the Metro or to neighborhood stores an opportunity to do so. And placing bike racks near bus stops would enable others who can't make it all the way to, say, Huntington Metro, and opportunity to bike part way. That seems a small investment to make in our infrastructure.

Reply

LawMom

9:01 am on Saturday, December 31, 2011

Whatever the solution is, there are lots of people crossing Rt 1 in between traffic lights at all hours of the day and night. Legal and safe crossing is not always near to bus stops. A solution that incorporates increased crossing opportunities, pedestrian education and traffic enforcement is needed to protect the public and help traffic run smoothly.

Reply

Leave a comment