Starbucks manager Stacy McDonald worked at the Fort Belvoir location for more than five years. As of Wednesday, she was fired after the company accused her of stealing $3.75 worth of merchandise while on the job.
Eight months pregnant, she has lost her health insurance and more than 200 hours of sick time that she was planning to use for maternity leave.
According to McDonald and some of her co-workers, the Army and Air Force Exchange Services (AAFES), which operates the 12th Street Starbucks on base, secretly videotaped its employees and accused them of stealing beverages and pastries on the job—and is docking some employees thousands of dollars in pay for doing so.
AAFES Loss Prevention interviewed a total of nine Starbucks employees who were told they owed money to AAFES, ranging from $3.75 to $13,951, McDonald said.
Employee Discovers Hidden Camera
A current employee, who asked his name be withheld due to the ongoing investigation, was cleaning the store on Dec. 22 and discovered a wire leading to a hidden camera. The employee contacted a supervisor and told her what he had found. He said he was instructed to leave the camera in place.
The camera remained in the store until Dec. 27. After that, employees who spoke to Patch aren't sure what happened to it, but a store manager reportedly contacted AAFES Security Loss Prevention to inform them that the camera was gone.
When asked why the camera was placed in Starbucks, AAFES spokesman Judd Anstey said in an email to Patch, "While the Exchange does not discuss the specifics of active investigations or security procedures, mobile video surveillance is used when potential misconduct or fraud is identified."
On Dec. 30, barista Kiara McKnight of Woodbridge arrived for her shift and was summoned to a meeting with Karen Bye, AAFES Loss Prevention manager, and Leo Varghese, AAFES headquarters investigator.
When a confused McKnight arrived at the loss prevention office, Varghese told her she was there for an internal investigation, McKnight said.
“[Varghese] printed a promissory note saying I owed $663 worth of milk and lemonade for adding it to coffee and tea,” said McKnight. “I drove back to work and thought about it. I thought it wasn’t right, and I revoked my promissory note the next day I came into work.”
McKnight requested a copy of her time and attendance record, which showed she worked 40 weeks. Varghese and Bye had charged McKnight based on 52 weeks of employment, McKnight said.
When McKnight returned to work after recanting on her promissory note, she was summoned to HR and was placed on suspension, she said. All nine employees were placed on a 30-day suspension, according to McDonald.
“I’ve been depressed because they’re labeling me as a thief, when I’m not,” said McKnight.
Two Seperate Beverage Policies
Starbucks corporate and AAFES each have separate, differing beverage policies. Both policies are concurrently in effect, according to Janice Blackwell of the National Association of Government Employees, a union that represents the Starbucks employees.
AAFES's policy states that while employees are on shift, they are authorized to have unlimited brewed coffee, tea, and fountain soda.
However, Starbucks' policy allows free beverages during work hours only before or after a shift or during a break and they must be entered into the computer for inventory tracking. The expectation is every barista is to sample coffee, espresso, milk and pastries to ensure quality and knowledge to provide effective information to customers.
Blackwell said AAFES proposed changes to its policy in November 2011. In order to negotiate the proposed changes, Blackwell requested information from AAFES because she was unclear on the specifics of those changes.
"AAFES never provided such [information on the specific proposed changes to the policy], therefore, no change was to be made until such time as the Union had the opportunity to bargain," Blackwell said in an email to Patch.
"The policies were very general and all employees had an understanding of what they were able to use," Blackwell continued. "It's a very unfortunate situation, and the other part of that situation is that it's a very ambiguous meal policy."
Interviews, Suspensions and Appeals
When AAFES Loss Prevention placed the concealed security camera in the store, they should have informed the union of their plans as per protocol, Blackwell said.
"It's an unfair labor practice," she said. "We just feel management didn't do a good job in this investigation."
McDonald was also brought in for a loss prevention interview. Varghese told her that employees were being brought in for theft and consuming products. According to McDonald, when she asked if the thefts involved employees walking out of the store with beverages, Varghese said no.
McDonald quickly asked to be excused from the interview. “The reason I left quickly was because I felt the focus of the interview was to try to incriminate me in some way,” she explained. “Once I requested that I have a lawyer, because of [Varghese’s] accusation, and when my rights were denied, I was immediately uncomfortable and felt harassed, so I left to end the interview.”
McDonald plans to appeal AAFES’ decision to fire her.
The union has responded to the proposed AAFES action, but it plans to file a grievance once the final decision has been made, Blackwell said.
Editor's Note: The AAFES Beverage Policy includes “bulk dispensed” coffee, tea, or soda at a “self service drink station," according to Judd Anstey, AAFES spokesman.
UPDATE Feb. 4, 6:25 a.m.: Stacy McDonald was fired for drinking an iced coffee and the price, $3.75 was actually miscalculated by AAFES, said McDonald in an email to Patch.
UPDATE Feb. 24, 9:58 a.m.: The National Association of Government Employees plans to file a complaint against AAFES on behalf of the Starbucks employees who were videotaped and charged for consumed food and beverages.
--------------
Do you live or work in the Fort Belvoir area?
Get Mount Vernon and/or Lorton Patch in your email inbox! Go to mountvernon.patch.com/newsletters or lorton.patch.com/newsletters to sign up.
Fan Mount Vernon Patch or Lorton Patch on Facebook.
With the kids today..if it is not one thing..it is another with them. The sad fact is that consumers are getting used to being treated badly by employees. There was a time when it did some good to talk to a manager..but now days they look at you like..''uh..there is really nothing I can do but apologize for them..." It has nothing to do with bad employers. I have had emloyees that I have loan money to in hard times, turn around and steal from me. You need to shut up.
Beyond that, it appears that you have perhaps read some of the comments above and started jumping to conclusions. Any intelligent person who has followed this string from the very beginning would not be 'popping off' in the manner that you are. In the ORIGINAL article (above) it clearly states that there are two **conflicting** policies. Even though they are conflicting, BOTH policies still allow employees to have coffee, tea, soda, etc. for FREE while on the job. AAFES policy states: While employees are on shift, they are authorized to have **unlimited** brewed coffee, tea, and fountain soda. Starbuck Policy says: free beverages during work hours only before or after a shift or during a break and they must be entered into the computer for inventory tracking. The expectation is every barista is to sample coffee, espresso, milk and pastries to ensure quality and knowledge to provide effective information to customers.
You indicated that 'V' strikes you as "disrespectful, mouthy, smart aleak (sic)..that can't respond to reason...and argue for the sake of arguing." Sir, with all due respect, I feel the same about you - - especially the part about responding to reason. In particular you are arrogant and opinionated and will attempt to insult anyone who doesn't agree with your view point. OK - - I've told you what I think . . . go ahead and blast me too. ANd while you're at it, stop hiding behind 'CJ'. Tell us your real name.
Thank you so much for your comments. I appreciate the fact that someone actually understands the whole situation. I worked their and wish to stay annonymous. I sure you understand. As of now there are still some employees sitting in limbo awaiting the decision from our GM. Can you imagine sitting and waiting to know if you are fierd or still emplyeed. Me I will never go back to work for AAFES after the way they treated us. I could see if one person did something wrong and they get terminated but for two stores to be cleaned out of all employees tells me that something is misunderstood and I think AAFES knows this now. They expected everyone to just say "oh well we are terminated now we have to find new jobs." I don't think they ever realized that we would stand up for ourselves because "We did not steal anything". Most of us have worked at that store for over 6 years and the store was doing better in sales and the bottom line each year. All the customers loved our crew and we loved them also. We looked at our customers as family. Heck we as employees thought of ourselves as a second family. You know sometimes you spend more time at work with you crew than you do at home. We all miss the closeness we shared. I hope that AAFES finds it in their hearts to end this correctly and especially give back Stacy her sick leave.
V I definitly understand about your son. I was there and I know the truth. God Bless all the Starbucks Crew at both stores. Hold your heads up high and we will prevail.
I'm certain all the reasonable folks following this will take note that your entire post was nothing more than an angry attack. And why so angry - - because I blew your argument clean out of the water. If you are so certain of your opinion why didn't you defend it by answering my question with some intelligent thoughts rather than spouting a stream of vitriol? Sir CJ - - I would not be a bit surprised if you were but a ‘kid’ compared to me as well - - but that’s really not important. As for using my full name - - I have nothing to hide. I am fully aware of how easy it is to track folks down on the internet. I do it all the time as a part of my own business. I don’t have a clue what kind of business you run (I wish I did so I could be sure not to patronize it) but I am a respected Mt. Vernon business owner myself since 1977. I can be found on multiple websites. Yes, there are a few whack-jobs that I should perhaps beware of - - but I wouldn’t want to name any names. Of course, if it comes right down to it they are relatively easy to ferret out as well. Will be gone for a day - - will check back when I return. Nytol . . . .
I live in Kansas, and also own a home in St Petersburg, Florida. I am not sure why that is even relelvant , just like my full name. This article stands alone as a news story I read and commented on..and regardless of whether I live there or not...you would have to be living in a daze to not agree that across the board..any fast food place you go..the service is dreadful. I am not saying all businesses with young people are like this..just reastaurants. You seriously don't know what a headache it is dealing with the youth of today in restaurants.
I find little use for people in this world that defend the wrong cause. Employees attitudes like this help degrade our country. Between all their stealing, their cell phone calls, their texting, being rude to cutomers, being late, not comeing in, not calling in, wanting unscheduled days off, not wanting to clean anything, poor sanitation, sneaking off to smoke, drug use, ...honestly..I could go on and on with this list.. On top of this you have to put up with the dangers they pose to just fabricate some story about being hurt, sexual harassment, if they are ADD..ADDHD...''whatever''..bi-polar, on medications, gay, racist's , thugs.... I'm going to quit...nobody here is listening.
Thanks so much for your comments, just a reminder to keep it civil. Jessie Biele, Local Editor
OMG!! KANSAS . . . Long shot but does CJ stand for Carl Joseph? Tell me it's you and you've just been jerking my chain!!! That would explain a lot 'cause I really didn't want to believe anyone could have such a negative, twisted view of the world.
I will keep the world I live in..you can have the la la land you live in. As I said, I retired out of the US Army over 25 years ago..I have little to prove to anyone as to my judge of people or charachter..or what is right and what is wrong.
My sons and I are starting business number 4 in Florida...''and'' I will be going back to hiring people again..but it won't be the restaurant business. We are going to be selling electric vehicles such as scooters and alternative neighborhood electric vehicles (NEV's). There is nothing rational about dealing with the younger employees in the restaurant business. It more like running a psycho ward. It is going to be an interesting change for us in Florida..no doubt about that. I am not so bad to work for. If you knew what some of my past employees were like, you would see things differently. You would swear they were from some heathen place like Northern VA. Isn't ''Deliverance'' the all time favorite movie there?
I looked up ''dolt'' in the urban dictionary..somewhat hilarious, really: ''A mental retard who is clueless not only about current events, but also has the IQ level of a rock''. But, Dave. You went too far. Call me dolt, but don't call me a Mental Retard. ''Dolt''? Yeah ..I can be that sometimes. My sons tell me so everyday. But... I have a lot of compassion for the disabled....retard jokes are not funny.
Another reminder to please keep the conversation civil, and I also ask that conversations stick to the topic of the above article. Thanks! Jessie Biele, Local Editor
If there is ''anyone'' I doubt this story is false about..it is ''that'' person. But I think AFFES Loss Control is probably correct in most of the other accusations. That is what these people are trained to do. They know their job and how to bust people. Why is that an unreasonable position for me to take and for most people to beleive? If you want to align your support with anyone, it should be with the Loss Control employees. What ..their jobs don't matter? ''Think'' about this people.