.

A Civics Lesson

A recent community briefing on uranium mining could have taught Capitol Hill a thing or two.

The notice from the Mount Vernon-Lee Chamber of Commerce said something about “uranium.”  My first reaction, of course, was, “Why can’t the Chamber drop the ‘Lee’ part?” 

Putting that long-held query aside, I was excited to be invited to a briefing by an organization whose name was something clever like “Patriotic Americans for Friendly, Cheap Energy.” It seems this group and the company it represented, was asking the state, uh, sorry, the Commonwealth to let the company start mining a 118 acre site in southern Virginia that was rich with uranium. Intrigued—and with the inducement of a free breakfast at Mamma’s Kitchen—I actually showered and went to the seminar.

About 20 folks attended the event, including state Del. Scott Surovell, who, in his usual candid style, said he was currently opposed to the proposal. But the first person I ran into was Sandy Liddy Bourne, a strong conservative whose father is G. Gordon Liddy of Watergate fame. Sandy and I disagree on everything, including the weather, but we’ve always had a cordial relationship and after opening pleasantries she told me she was working with that “Uranium Will Save the World and Make People Happier” group. I wasn’t shocked and she wisely argued right up front that opening up the mining would create billions of jobs. She was smooth on her feet as always, but because she was the messenger I honestly didn’t listen too closely. 

Then presentation was led by a folksy guy who looked like one of Herman’s Hermits doing an ad for Brooks Brothers. He had the obligatory powerpoint with lots of charts and graphs that I could not read but he did get my attention.  In fact, while Del. Surovell had said one reason he opposed the plan was because the “people in the community opposed” it, I started thinking how that is the same reasoning given for denying so many cell phone tower applications here in Mount Vernon, so when Herman said it was a “small but vocal” group of opponents, I did not reject him out of hand.    

The first thing I learned was that the company would actually be extracting dirt with uranium in it—and the uranium is not radioactive! Also, it is an alternative source of energy, which we desperately need and, yes, it would create jobs, bring in revenue, etc. Fearing the worst, I asked what would happen if one of their trucks crashed on Route One.  Their answer was simple: he said they’ll send in a crew and pick it up!  In other words, don’t worry folks, if there was an accident the community would not be glowing like Homer Simpson the next day. 

Now, it should come as no surprise when I say that I am a strong environmentalist. We recycle, we have a compost bin and I wear bio-degradable underwear. So, yes, I’m still a little nervous about this proposal. But I can’t articulate why I’m nervous about it. I’m sure—and I encourage—I will soon hear from the opponents of the proposal. 

But that’s almost beside the point. Without getting too corny, I want to note that this meeting epitomized what American is all about—or what it should be about. People from the entire political spectrum got together to talk and learn about an issue. We listened, asked questions, debated and shook hands afterwards, even if we may ultimately disagree. In fact, I am now inspired to do some more reading about this issue and, who knows, I just may come out in support the measure (not that my endorsement means diddly-squat). 

The point is that I appreciate the Chamber for sponsoring this event and I anticipate the Sierra Club is not far behind. And that’s cool. More importantly, I want to thank everyone in that room for taking such a civil approach to a controversial issue. It was a great democratic experience. Del. Surovell was open about his “current” position. I got to ask the experts some good questions.  There were no bumper stickers within miles of the event. 

The politicians on Capitol Hill could have learned a thing or two from us.

H. Jay Spiegel December 08, 2011 at 11:41 AM
Why do I have to reveal your name? Why don't you do it yourself? Compiling those stats took about 10 minutes, a worthy time expenditure to amply make my point. Talk about petty: All I had to do was politely point out that if "rant rave" should be identified, so should you. I was responding to Fitzsimmons' comment: "Why not use your real name since you're so opinionated?" and wondering why he was discriminating against "rant rave" when the most opinionated, obnoxious poster on PATCH remains anonymous. Does your definition of "an intelligent conversation" include your post that was deleted by the editor as including profanity? You are truly delusional. If you are "grown ups," heaven help us.
H. Jay Spiegel December 08, 2011 at 12:06 PM
Come on, DAVE, identify yourself! No, you're not wasting time counting comments - you're wasting time posting profane comments that get deleted. I'm capable of being passionate without descending into profanity. There's only one "grown up" in this conversation.
H. Jay Spiegel December 08, 2011 at 12:34 PM
DAVE has deleted his comments that I responded to apparently to make it look like I'm talking to myself. I'll leave my comments posted to make clear there was something said by DAVE to which I responded.
Ron Fitzsimmons December 08, 2011 at 01:53 PM
Jesse, please shut down the comments on this thread. This current conversation is not productive at all.
Jessie Biele December 08, 2011 at 02:01 PM
And the comments thread has been closed down.

Boards

More »
Got a question? Something on your mind? Talk to your community, directly.
Note Article
Just a short thought to get the word out quickly about anything in your neighborhood.
Share something with your neighbors.What's on your mind?What's on your mind?Make an announcement, speak your mind, or sell somethingPost something
See more »