.
News Alert
Weather Alert for Northern Virginia

Schools Find More Than $9 M for FY 2014 Budget

As the Fairfax County School board stares down $162 million deficit, midyear review funds will help boost next year's beginning balance.

Fairfax County Public Schools has found an extra $9.7 million in its Fiscal Year 2013 budget, much of which school board members voted Thursday night to set aside for its FY 2014 beginning balance — a budget year in which the system faces a $162 million deficit. 

The money will increase next year's beginning balance from $41.6 million to $51.1 million. 

School board members have been waiting for the outcome of a midyear budget review since the fall, as it began to grapple with a projected deficit of $93.7 million in Fiscal Year 2014, a number that doesn't include another $68.4 million shortfall in "significant program needs."

At a joint meeting in November, about half of the $162 million the school system needs, according to budget documents.

School board members began to suggest finding savings in this year's budget that could be used to create a larger starting budget next year. 

Staff found another $2.7 million in the system's FY 2013 beginning balance after the FY 2012 final budget review, thanks to year-end and audit adjustments that include an additional $1.8 million in sales tax revenue.

The system also gained $2.9 million in additional revenue from the City of Fairfax, whose final tuition bill was $1.8 million more than budgeted, and a $1.1 million increase in grant revenue.

A total of $4.1 million in savings was found through:

  • A $2.9 million reduction in compensation accounts because the average new hire salaries were less than budgeted
  • A net increase of $1.1 million in grant expenditures largely from a larger federal award for the Individuals with Disabilities Education Act 
  • $1 million in savings from giving benefits to parent liaisons and multilingual interpreters
  • $0.8 million in savings for a reduction in the mandated time frame for bus inspections
  • $0.5 million less in the transfer for extended school year for special education.

The board passed a motion by Sandy Evans (Mason) on Thursday to take $0.2 million of the midyear review money and put it toward increasing funding for schools for parent liaisons, to "ensure that each school receives funding in FY 2013 that is comparable to funding received in FY 2012. 

A motion by Elizabeth Schultz (Springfield) to give up to $0.5 million in additional funding to teacher stipends and instructional materials for extra learning time for special education students failed. 

“Just because it’s more convenient to do it later and more strategically, doesn’t mean it meets student needs," said Schultz, the lone supporter of the amendment. 

But Schultz's motion to direct Superintendent Jack Dale to financially support schools in danger of canceling programs or initiatives in order to pay for hardcopy math textbooks — a response to a failed attempt to switch every Fairfax student to online math texts — passed, though it's not clear how much money that will entail. 

Patch Editor Raytevia Evans reported for this story.

Bob Bruhns December 21, 2012 at 02:57 PM
With Billions of dollars of budget shortfall in Fairfax County alone, it's painful to watch how hard it is to save a million here, a million there, etc. This is why I keep screaming about the Dulles Rail / Silver Line project's apparent double price. Recovering the $2.5 billion to $3 billion in overcost there, and the huge finance charges on money borrowed to pay that overcost, would go a long way toward covering school and transportation funding shortages. Unfortunately, nobody around here seems to understand money, and school cutbacks will no doubt cause that ignorance to increase. Those who may be interested should do a web search on ' The excessive pricing of the Dulles Rail / Silver Line Metrorail project ' - and those who can not believe that a double price in such a project is even possible, should do a web search on ' MWAA's Weak Policies and Procedures Have Led to Questionable Procurement Practices, Mismanagement, and a Lack of Overall Accountability ', and read about MWAA funneling contracts to the double-pricing "Contractor A" on page 14 of the US DOT report (page 15 of the pdf). People who find $2.5 Billion to $3 Billion in overcosts unacceptable might want to contact their so-called 'leaders' and tell them to demand answers from the project cost estimators NOW. Why does everything in that rail project cost two times what it should cost? We need that money for other things!

Boards

More »
Got a question? Something on your mind? Talk to your community, directly.
Note Article
Just a short thought to get the word out quickly about anything in your neighborhood.
Share something with your neighbors.What's on your mind?What's on your mind?Make an announcement, speak your mind, or sell somethingPost something